Legal Opinion

Kowalski v. Rose Drugs of Dardanelle, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 29, 2009No. 09-26PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL E. DANIELSON, Justice.

liAppellant Virginia Kowalski, individually and as special administratrix of the Estate of Kevin Allen Curry, Deceased, and on behalf of the statutory beneficiaries of the Estate of Kevin Allen Curry (“the Estate”), appeals from the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment to ap-pellee Rose Drugs of Dardanelle, Inc. Its sole point on appeal is that the circuit court erred in concluding that Rose Drugs, as a pharmacy, had no general duty to warn, not to fill dangerous prescriptions, and to inquire of a prescribing physician. Because the circuit court’s order…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Franklin v. Osca, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Howard v. Dallas Morning News, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Davis v. Wausau Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Kohl v. American Home Products Corp.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1999
  5. McKinney v. BishopSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kowalski v. Rose Drugs of Dardanelle, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  2. Carter v. ClineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Hankook Tire Co. Ltd. v. PhilpotCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  4. Gray v. White River Health System, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  5. Almeida v. Metal Studs, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API