Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenman, J.

This is an action by the beneficiary against an insurance company to recover the face value of a life insurance policy. Payment is resisted on the ground that the policy lapsed because of non-payment of premium. The policy is a Massachusetts policy, issued on October 24, 1929. The first annual premium of $139.32 was paid. The second annual premium, due October 24, 1930, has not been paid. On January 22, 1930, a dividend was declared by the defendant, payable on the anniversary dates of policies in force during that year. In accordance with this resolution, a dividend of $37.38 on this policy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Rickerson v. . Hartford Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Gardner v. National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Weinstein v. Mutual Trust Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Price v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rose and Lucy, Inc. v. Resolute Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1965
  2. Simmons v. Cambridge Savings BankMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API