Legal Opinion

Merkel v. Long

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1964No. Calendar 72, Docket 50,383PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, C. J.

(for affirmance). Some question having arisen as to the proper interpretation of provisions of the last will and testament of Paul R. Cray, who passed away in 1929, the parties concerned entered into an agreement under the so-called Dodge act * to settle the controversy. Petition was filed in the circuit court of Wayne county requesting the approval of said agreement and a direction to the trustees under the will to execute it. An order was entered in accordance with the petition, whereupon the trustees appealed to this Court. The decision reached is reported as Merkel v. Long, 368 Mich 1,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Becht v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. In Re Estate of ReeveIllinois Supreme Court · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Merkel v. LongMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. In Re Valentino EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Abel v. Grossman Investments Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Bates v. MallamoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. Merkel v. LongMichigan Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API