Legal Opinion

Pope v. Board of School Commissioners

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 29, 1995No. 1982PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

Pro Se appellant Mayner J. Pope appeals from an order of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City that granted appellees’ Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment and denied appellant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Essentially appellant presents two questions on appeal, which we restate as follows:

I. Did the trial court err in concluding that appellant’s wrongful interference with contract claim failed to state a cause of action because it was asserted against the employees of a party to the contract?

II. Did the trial court err in applying the doctrine of collateral estoppel to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. MPC, Inc. v. KennyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Wilmington Trust Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Advance Telecom Process LLC v. DSFederal, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  2. Lewis v. Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  3. Brown & Sturm v. Frederick Road Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Gerald v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Monarc Construction, Inc. v. Aris Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API