Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1999PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The primary issue on appeal is whether Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc. (Employer) is entitled to a “dollar-for-dollar” credit against the compensation owed to Ray Wallace (Claimant) for a $65,000 lump sum injury settlement that Employer paid Claimant. Because it is, the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) is affirmed in part. A second issue is whether Employer unreasonably contested the work-relatedness of Claimant’s injury. Because it did, the decision of the Board is also reversed and remanded in part.

The relevant facts are as follows. On…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Milton S. Hershey Medical Center v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Station v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Joyner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Furnari v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Pennsylvania State University v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Department of Corrections v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Clark)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API