Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Snyder

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 22, 2009No. 25 MAP 2007, 26 MAP 2007, 27 MAP 2007, and 28 MAP 2007PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

In this appeal we are asked to determine whether the lower courts erred in finding Appellees’ federal due process rights were violated, and thus suppressing evidence against them based on our decision in Commonwealth v. Deans, 530 Pa. 514, 610 A.2d 32 (1992), in light of. the United States Supreme Court’s subsequent pronouncement in Illinois v. Fisher, 540 U.S. 544, 124 S.Ct. 1200, 157 L.Ed.2d 1060 (2004). For the reasons which follow, we reverse.

Beginning in January 2001, Appellee Group Two Properties (“Group Two”) owned a dirt lot in Reading, Pennsylvania, which…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BriggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. Woodard, A., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API