Commonwealth v. Neely
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge:
Appellant James Neely was convicted by jury of recklessly endangering another person and of possessing an instrument of crime. He appeals from the judgment of sentence. Neely asserts that the trial court erred by failing to include in its reputation evidence jury charge the words “character testimony in and of itself is such as to create a reasonable doubt.” Prior Superior Court panels have found reversible error where the trial court failed to charge that reputation evidence may in itself raise a reasonable doubt about the defendant’s guilt. Because these cases appear to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Edgington v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Commonwealth v. OhleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. BooneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. NeelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. RiffertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. PizzoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Harris v. Sheriff of Delaware CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. TippensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.