Legal Opinion
Sjaastad v. Great Northern Railway Co.
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided February 10, 1958No. Civ. No. 3146PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
REGISTER, Chief Judge.
By its memorandum opinion dated October 11, 1957, 155 F.Supp. 307, this *761'Court denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment and granted plaintiff’s motion for leave to file amended •complaint. By such memorandum opinion, in denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, this Court held in effect that in its opinion the sole and •exclusive authority and jurisdiction to ■determine and adjust the cause of action herein is not by law vested solely in the National Railroad Adjustment Board, but that this Court does have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Virginia S. Smithey v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
- Sjaastad v. Great Northern Railway Co.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1957
- Oswald v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. CO.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Cook v. ThompsonDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1957
3Cited by1 opinion
- J. W. Cook v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959