Legal Opinion
Oswald v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. CO.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 31, 1952No. 14633PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion of the plaintiff (appellant) to amend his amended complaint, and granting a motion of the defendant (appellee) to dismiss that complaint and consequently the plaintiff’s action.
Tile plaintiff in his original complaint, filed January 9, 1952, alleged that the defendant is a common carrier in interstate commerce within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, Title 45 U.S. C.A. § 151 et seq.; that since May 12, 1922, the plaintiff had been employed by the defendant as a carpenters’ helper; that on October 31, 1949,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Sparks v. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Priest v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Koppal v. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
3Cited by5 opinions
- Donahoo v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Sjaastad v. Great Northern Railway Co.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1957
- Cook v. ThompsonDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1957
- Rose v. Great Northern Railway Co.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1957
- Sjaastad v. Great Northern Railway Co.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1958