Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Florez

California Court of Appeal, 6th District

Decided March 14, 2016No. H040327Published

1Dissent

RUSHING, P.J., Dissenting

I. Introduction

My esteemed colleagues join a number of courts in refusing to apply Penal Code section 1170.18, subdivision (c)(§-1170.18(c)), according to its plain meaning. To the best of my knowledge, only one of those decisions is currently citable. (People v. Esparza (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 726, 734-737, 195 Cal.Rptr.3d 597; see Cal. Rules of Court, rules 8.1115(a), 8.1105(e)(1).) Although I joined in that decision, I have concluded on further reflection that I erred in doing so, as I believe my colleagues continue to err here. All of these cases should be governed…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  5. People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API