Legal Opinion

Cope v. Louisiana State Live Stock Sanitary Board

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1937No. 5466PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Judge.

In compliance with certain live stock regulations and laws of this state, plaintiff delivered his 5-year old mule to representatives of' defendant on March 19, 1936, in order that it might be dipped in an arsenic solution. On that same date the dipping took place at Willis’ vat in Rapides parish. Nine days thereafter, or on March-28, 1936, it died.

Plaintiff charges in this suit that the mule was in perfect condition and health prior to the occurrence of the dipping; that defendant’s representatives, while acting in the scope of their employment, placed a rope about the mule’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  2. Green v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  3. Booth v. Louisiana Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  4. Orgeron v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. De Moss v. Police Jury of Bossier ParishSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Angelle v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  2. State Ex Rel. Noe v. KnopLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Bernard v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Pelt v. Louisiana State Live Stock Sanitary BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. D'Asaro v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API