Legal Opinion

Scruton v. Dziewisz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHalpern, J.

The respondent in a filiation proceeding appeals from an order of the Children’s Court, denying his motion to vacate the complaint upon the ground that the complaint had been verified before a notary public and not before the Children’s Court Judge.

Subdivision 4 of section 122 of the Domestic Relations Law reads as follows: ‘ ‘ The complaint shall be in writing, or oral *278and in the presence of the complainant reduced to writing by the judge or the clerk of the court. It shall be verified by oath or affirmation of complainant.”

It will be noted that, under the terms of the statute, the complaint…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of ClausiNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Feyler v. MortimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Simis v. AlwangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. Mooney v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  5. Sample v. State ex rel. BrooksIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fitzsimmons v. De CiccoNew York City Family Court · 1964
  2. Sheridan v. MajorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  3. People v. BowersNew York Family Court · 1958
  4. Schon v. OrtnerNew York Court of Special Session · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API