Legal Opinion

Roth v. Roth

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 18, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

The bill of complaint in this case was filed by a husband who is separated from his wife, and its purpose is to have a lot of ground, of which he is the owner, sold free of his wife’s inchoate right of dower. It is alleged in the bill that such a sale would be advantageous to the parties interested. Tbe specific prayer of the bill is that a decree be passed appointing a trustee for tbe dower interest .of tbe defendant and directing the trustee to join with the plaintiff in a sale of tbe property and to invest one-third of the proceeds for the benefit of tbe plaintiff during bis life, or so…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Masterman v. MastermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  2. Reiff v. HorstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  3. Duttera v. BabylonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  4. Hill v. BolandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  5. Mitchell v. FarrishCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Trotter v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Whitelock v. WhitelockCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  3. Silberman v. Jacobs & SilbermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Schneider v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  5. United States v. Certain Parcels of Land in City of AnnapolisDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API