United States v. Certain Parcels of Land in City of Annapolis
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
In this federal land condemnation case the question presently arising is whether a wife is entitled to compensation, out of the damages awarded for the taking of her husband’s real estate, for destruction of her inchoate right of dower therein.
Although the existence of this question has been implicit in very many of the recent condemnation cases in this court, it has never heretofore been presented for decision because the uniform prior practice has been, in distributing the damages awarded for the taking of the husband’s land, and deposited in court by the Government,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Chouteau v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1941
- Hawley v. BradfordNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Swanson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Silberman v. Jacobs & SilbermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Schneider v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- United States v. PrettymanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- Shelton v. SheltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.