Legal Opinion

Wright v. Cowie

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1892No. 606PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

*342The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

The action of the lower court in holding that the plaintiff could not maintain his lien in this cause was right. If we construe the proceeding as an attempt to enforce the lien against the entire building known as the Cowie block, it must fail for the reason that the owner of the leasehold interest in a portion of the land covered by said building, and of a part of the building erected thereon, is not made a party to the notice of lien or to the action. If we construe it to be an attempt to enforce such lien as against the portion of the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. McClintic-Marshall Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Pacific Rolling Mill Co. v. Bear Valley Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Seidel v. BloeserMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Orear v. Dierks Lumber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. DeSoto National Bank v. Arcadia Electric Light, Ice & Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API