Legal Opinion

Denson v. Pine State Creamery Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 17, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

It is contended by defendant that tbe deed from Bradley S. Johnson, individually and as trustee, to plaintiff Lee A. Denson, did not convey a perfect title for any lands wbicb passed to Bradley S. Johnson, trustee, by virtue of item 6 of the will, for the reason that the said land does not refer to the power under the will conferred by item 6. In item 10, the trustee is given power to sell and convey “the whole or any part” of the property, “without liability on the part of any purchaser to see to the proper application of the purchase money.” While in item 6, the sole provision is “with…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blagge v. MilesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1841
  2. Funk v. EgglestonIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Carraway v. . MoseleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Exum v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Matthews v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. First Presbyterian Church of Raleigh v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Schaeffer v. . HaseltineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Tocci v. . NowfallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Thomson v. EhrlichSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  5. Tocci v. NowfallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API