Legal Opinion

United States v. Sylvester Burnside

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 30, 1987No. 87-1073PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID W. WILLIAMS, District Judge:

Sylvester Burnside, an American Indian, pled guilty to a superseding information which charged involuntary sodomy, a violation of the Major Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1153 and A.R.S. Secs. 13-1406 and 13-1401. The victim was an Indian minor who did not consent to the act. The offense occurred on the Navajo Indian Reservation in the State of Arizona. Burnside appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss upon the ground that the federal district Court lacked jurisdiction over the offense charged. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291.

This appeal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Rose v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. State v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. United States v. Benny Marion RiderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Other MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Michael J. BearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. BacklundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. BacklundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. NarciaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API