Legal Opinion
Tremouliaris v. Pina
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided March 27, 1987PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.
The Tremouliarises agreed to buy and the Pinas agreed to sell a single family dwelling in Assonet. A purchase and sale agreement, signed by the parties on April 13, 1985, included a mortgage contingency clause which provided: “This agreement is subject to the BUYERS obtaining approval for mortgage financing in the amount of $49,400. The BUYERS agree to apply promptly for said mortgage loan from an institutional lender at current interest rates. If the BUYERS having used due diligence fail in good faith to obtain a loan commitment within 30 days then this agreement shall become null and void…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Clark v. State Street Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Stewart v. Griffith Ex Rel. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- DeFreitas v. CoteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Fay, Spofford & Thorndike, Inc. v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Raynor v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lajayi v. FafiyebiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- Shapiro v. GrinspoonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- 1800 Smith Street Associates, LP v. GencarelliSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Churgin v. HobbieMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
- Coviello v. RichardsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.