Legal Opinion

State v. Dillard

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 3, 2021No. A168932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

27 Argued and submitted July 16, 2020, affirmed June 3, 2021 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DIONNE MECHELE DILLARD, Defendant-Appellant. Curry County Circuit Court 18CR34644; A168932

490 P3d 176

Defendant was involved in taking merchandise from a Fred Meyer store without paying for it. A jury returned a verdict of guilty for first-degree theft for taking property with an aggregate value of “$1,000 or more,” ORS 164.055(1)(a). On appeal, defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support a find- ing that the property she took had a value of $1,000 or more because some of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. VanornumOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. DilalloOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. CallaghanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. State v. PulverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. YertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. State v. FarrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API