Legal Opinion
State v. M.M.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided August 29, 2001No. CR00-1296PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1,WOODARD, Judge.
In this criminal iiugation, a jury emu, ict-ed M.M., the Defendant, for the triple murder of his father, L.lVL, his mother, H.L.M.; and his son, R.M. In essence on appeal, the Defendant argues that the evidence was insufficient co convict him and that every reasonable hypothesis of his innocence was not excluded, as required.
After reviewing the evidence in liglil most favorable to the proseen Lion, we find that it is sufficient to satisfy a radonal juror of the Defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Further, finding no merit in the Defendant’s remaining assignments of…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. HearoldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. BuckleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- State v. JuniorsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. VillalobosColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. TassinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- State v. QueenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.