Legal Opinion

Ward v. Wrixon

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1959No. Civ. 9437PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

Respondent above named commenced an action against defendant praying judgment that it be decreed she was entitled to a life estate in certain real property. The amended complaint alleged in substance that on or about February 14, 1953, Perry A. Snideman verbally agreed with Mary Ward, respondent, that if she lived with him until his death, rendered to him services as a housekeeper, and contributed her pension of $59 a month, he would, in the event he predeceased her, give her a life estate in a two-story apartment-residence in Sacramento, California, together with the rents and profits…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Ruinello v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shabrick v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Horstmann v. SheldonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API