Legal Opinion

Van Horn v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1974No. 11485-PRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Vice Chief Justice.

On 26 June 1974, we filed our opinion in the matter of Timothy K. Van Horn v. Industrial Commission, Respondent, Lyman H. Rollins, Respondent Employer, 111 Ariz. 86, 523 P.2d 783 (1974). A complete statement of facts is set forth in that opinion. In that opinion we held that the Commission under our Constitution had “inherent power ... to relieve a workman of his failure to file a timely application for compensation” and we stated:

“We hold, under the facts in this case, that the employer and the Commission may be estopped to claim the untimeliness of the filing as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kerby v. State Ex Rel. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Collins v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Priedigkeit v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  4. Van Horn v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  5. BOARD OF TR. OF MARANA EL. SCH. v. WildermuthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Magma Copper Co. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. McKaskle v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. Allen v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Holler v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API