Legal Opinion

Auwood v. Harry Brandt Booking Office, Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 21, 1984No. Civ. No. N-79-144 (PCD)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS

DORSEY, District Judge.

Issue

Defendant Groton Cinema I & II, Inc., joined by defendants United Artists Corp. and Paramount Pictures Corp., have moved for a court trial as to the claims against them. Where plaintiffs’ original complaint is accompanied by a general jury demand, timely under Fed.R.Civ.P. 38(b), plaintiffs’ failure to reassert or restate the jury demand in subsequent amended complaints which add new defendants without affecting the basic character of the litigation does not constitute a waiver of the right of trial by jury as to the subsequently added…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,959 Frank Lanza, Jr. v. Drexel & Co., Theodore J. Kircher and Christie F. VitoloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Winifred D. Noonan v. Cunard Steamship Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. Rosen v. DickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. Ligouri v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  2. P.C. Data Centers of PA., Inc. v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Hill v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2021
  4. Stevens v. Flagstar Bank, National AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API