Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Consumers Public Power District v. Boettcher

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1940No. 30886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paine, j.

This is an original action in mandamus. The relator is the Consumers Public Power District, of Columbus, Nebraska, and such relator prays that an alternative writ of mandamus should issue, requiring its own secretary, in accordance with a resolution duly passed, to sign, execute and deliver a memorandum of agreement, exhibit C, dated November 20, 1939, which is supplementary to a memorandum of agreement, dated September 6, 1939, marked exhibit B, also attached to the petition, which the secretary has duly signed. The sole question at issue is whether this supplementary agreement,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Omaha v. Omaha Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Winston v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Brewer v. City of Point PleasantWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Drummond v. City of ColumbusNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. City of Curtis v. Maywood Light Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Interstate Power Co. v. Town of McGregorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  2. Consumers Public Power District v. EldredNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  3. T v. Transmission, Inc. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Town of Lovell v. MenhallWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Town of Lovell v. MenhallWyoming Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API