Legal Opinion

Lee v. Municipality of Anchorage

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided May 23, 2003No. A-8205PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COATS, Chief Judge.

This case presents the question of what culpable mental states the Municipality must prove when it charges a person with maintaining a place of prostitution under Section 8.65.060 of the Anchorage Municipal Code (AMC). Kyong Suk Lee was convicted of two separate violations of AMC 8.65.060(A), which provides that it is "unlawful for any person to knowingly maintain or operate a place, building, structure or part thereof, vehicle, mobile home, or other conveyance for the purpose of prostitution or assignation." Lee claims that under this ordinance, the Municipality not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. PeoniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  2. State v. ABC TOWINGCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1998
  3. Colgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
  2. Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
  3. Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
  4. Patrick Dale Burton-Hill v. State of Alaska, Jerald Dwayne Burton Jr. v. State of Alaska, Marcus Djaun Howard v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API