Legal Opinion
Morgan v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided July 28, 2006No. A-8639PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
Frederick W. Morgan III appeals his conviction for second-degree sexual assault. This is the third time that his ease has come before this Court.
Originally, Morgan’s primary point on appeal was that the superior court should have allowed him to introduce evidence that the victim of the alleged sexual assault had knowingly made false accusations of sexual assault in the past. In our first decision in Morgan’s case, Morgan v. State (Morgan I), 54 P.3d 382 (Alaska App.2002), we remanded Morgan’s case to the superior court with directions to re-evaluate Morgan’s offer of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Paul John Carbo, Frank Palermo, Joseph Sica, Louis Tom Dragna, and Truman K. Gibson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- People v. EspinozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Freeman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- McIntyre v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006