Legal Opinion

Donahoo v. Ohio Department of Youth Services

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 26, 2002No. 501CV1137PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LIMBERT, 1 United States Magistrate Judge.

The instant case came before this Court on Defendant Ohio Department of Youth Services’ (ODYS) Motion for Summary Judgment. See Electronic Court Filing (hereinafter “ECF”) Dkt. # 33. Plaintiff Maurice Donahoo (Plaintiff) filed an opposition memorandum and Defendant replied. See ECF Dkt. ## 39, 56. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant ODYS’ Motion for Summary Judgment on all of the claims contained in Plaintiffs amended complaint. See ECF Dkt. # 33.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Defendant ODYS, an agency of the State…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MacK v. HolcombDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
  2. Ames v. State of Ohio Department of Youth ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API