Donahoo v. Ohio Department of Youth Services
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LIMBERT, 1 United States Magistrate Judge.
The instant case came before this Court on Defendant Ohio Department of Youth Services’ (ODYS) Motion for Summary Judgment. See Electronic Court Filing (hereinafter “ECF”) Dkt. # 33. Plaintiff Maurice Donahoo (Plaintiff) filed an opposition memorandum and Defendant replied. See ECF Dkt. ## 39, 56. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant ODYS’ Motion for Summary Judgment on all of the claims contained in Plaintiffs amended complaint. See ECF Dkt. # 33.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Defendant ODYS, an agency of the State…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MacK v. HolcombDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
- Ames v. State of Ohio Department of Youth ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022