MacK v. Holcomb
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
Earl Mack brought suit against Dwight Holcomb, Kenneth Morckel, Carol Nolan Drake, the Ohio Department of Public Safety (ODPS), and the Ohio Department of Administrative Services (ODAS) alleging violations of federal law, under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983, Title VII, 42 U.S.C.2000e et seq., and various state law claims. Pending is defendants’ motion to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1367.
For the following reasons defendants’ motion will be granted in part and denied in part. 1
Background
Mack is an…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Way v. Shawnee TownshipDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016
- Manley v. HughesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019