Municipal Bond & Mortgage Corp. v. Bishop's Harbor Drainage District

TERRELL, J.:

This is the third time we have considered this case. On first consideration, Tervin, et al. v. State, ex rel. Landis, 116 Fla. 633, 156 So. 627, a quo warranto proceeding we held the act under which Bishop’s Harbor Drainage District was attempted to be created valid, but we held the district to be without legal existence because essential requirements of the act were not met in its creation. We affirmed the lower court as to the ouster of Tervin, the supervisor, but reversed it as to the ouster of Osborn, the receiver. We also reversed the lower court as to the holding that…