City of Richmond v. Suddarth

HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

On June 13, 2001, the City of Richmond (“City”), pursuant to ordinances in compliance with the enabling legislation contained in Section 67.400, 1 proposed the demolition of three of appellant Donald Suddarth’s buildings, which the City, at the conclusion of a hearing, deemed a nuisance. During the hearing, Suddarth was unrepresented by counsel, as he was when he filed three so-called “Motions to Appeal” in the Circuit Court of Ray County. Suddarth had not filed a copy of the record with the court, within thirty days of the filing of any of these motions, as…