Legal Opinion
James v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided January 25, 1989No. 964-84, 965-84PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
McCORMICK, Presiding Judge.
Appellants were convicted by a jury of aggravated robbery and punishment was *777assessed at ten years’ confinement. The Court of Appeals for the First Supreme Judicial District abated both appeals and ordered that the trial court hold an eviden-tiary hearing to determine whether appellants’ trial counsel had warned them “of the risks inherent in joint representation.” See Gonzales v. State, 605 S.W.2d 278 (Tex.Cr.App.1980). The trial judge filed findings of fact and conclusions of law, determining there was no actual…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ex Parte DuffyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Ingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Ex Parte MorrowCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Routier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Monreal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Acosta v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- In the Interest of B.L.D.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.