Legal Opinion

United States Nat. Bank of Denver v. Bartges

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 2, 1950No. 16555PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

We have had this cause before us on a prior occasion. See, No. 16003, United States National Bank v. Bartges, 120 Colo. 317, 210 P. (2d) 600. The facts giving rise to the controversy are fully set forth in that case and no good purpose would be served by repeating them. For *548reasons fully set forth in our former opinion, we remanded the cause for further proceedings, with direction to the trial court as follows: “The cause is remanded with directions to enter a money judgment for such sum as shall be determined by the court, from the evidence heard upon the trial, as will result in a fair and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States National Bank v. BartgesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  2. Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  3. Ginsberg v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Schantz v. SchantzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  2. Trussell v. United Underwriters, Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 1964
  3. Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Helen Churches Peffer v. Charles E. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  5. Franklin Supply Company, Etc. v. Albert W. Tolman, Jr. And Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API