Legal Opinion

ALLIED OFFICE SUPPLIES INC. v. Lewandowski

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 5, 2003No. 3:03CV367 (JBA)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AFTER HEARING [DOC. #11]

ARTERTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Allied Office Supplies, Inc. (“Allied”) brings this suit against its former employees, defendants Jonathan Cox and Allen Lewandowski, 1 and defendant W.B. Mason Company, Inc. (“Mason”), one of Allied’s competitors in the office supply business, alleging generally that Cox and Lewandowski breached the restrictive covenants in their employment agreements with Allied and that all three defendants tortiously interfered with Allied’s contractual and business relationships. On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ursini v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  2. Motorola Credit Corp. v. UzanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. L & R Realty v. Connecticut National BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. First Charter National Bank v. RossConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  5. Jackson v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. J.S.R. v. SessionsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
  2. New Hope Family Servs., Inc. v. PooleDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019
  3. Vincent v. ESSENT HEALTHCARE OF CTDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
  4. Barrett v. MaciolDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
  5. Floodbreak, LLC v. Diego Trust, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API