Legal Opinion
Vincent v. ESSENT HEALTHCARE OF CT
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 18, 2007No. 3:04CV491 (JBA)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. #255]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Defendants Mortman, M.D., Physicians for Women’s Health (“PWH”), and Sharon Ob/Gyn filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 255] pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c) on all claims against PWH claiming statute of limitations bar and on Heather Vincent’s claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress. For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES defendants’ Motion on all claims against PWH and GRANTS defendants’ Motion on the negligent infliction of emotional distress claim.
I. Procedural and Factual…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Anthony A. Calderone, Clark Hornbaker, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- ANTHONY STERLING v. Provident Life & Acc. Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2007