Legal Opinion
Burke v. Quick Lift, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 16, 2006No. 05-CV-3731 (JFB)(WDW)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BIANCO, District Judge.
This is an action brought in admiralty, pursuant to Rule 9(h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs Dr. Joseph and Maria Burke (the “Burkes”) bring this maritime and derivative torts action against defendants Quick Lift, Inc., (“Quick Lift”) and Staten Island Boat Sales (“SIBS”) (collectively, “defendants”), alleging that the Burkes were injured as a result of defendants’ failure to properly install a piece of equipment on a yacht purchased by the Burkes. This Court has jurisdiction over the Burkes’ claims under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1333 and…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lyons v. Rienzi & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Burke v. QUICK LIFT, INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Donnelly v. Slingshot Sports LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- Craig v. The City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- Duszak v. The Bridgeport & Port Jefferson Steamboat CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.