Legal Opinion

United States v. One Parcel of Real Property Located at 461 Shelby County Road 361

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided July 12, 1994No. 2:93-cv-02669PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ACKER, District Judge.

On June 6, 1994, this court entered an order in the above-entitled case directing the Probation Service to furnish the court with findings and an opinion in the nature of a pre-sentence report as to whether the forfeiture here sought by the United States against real property owned by Perry H. Brasher and Patricia Ann Brasher would violate the Excessive Fines Clause in view of Austin v. United States, — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 2801, 125 L.Ed.2d 488 (1993). 1 On June 22, 1994, the United States filed a brief entitled “Government’s Response to Claimants’…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. SarbelloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Real Property Located at 6625 Zumirez DriveDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. One Parcel Property Located at 427 & 429 Hall StreetCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Aravanis v. Somerset CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Public Employee Retirement Administration Commission v. BettencourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  4. United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at 32 Medley LaneDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
  5. No. 94-6643Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API