Legal Opinion

United States of America v. Harvey J Dockstader, Jr.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided August 17, 2026No. 3:25-cv-08139Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 United States of America, No. CV-25-08139-PCT-KML 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Harvey J Dockstader, Jr., 13 Defendant. 14 15 The United States filed this suit to reduce defendant Harvey J. Dockstader, Jr.’s 16 federal income tax assessments to judgment. It appeared Dockstader was evading service, 17 but he was served through alternative means. (Docs. 7, 12.) His default was entered and 18 the United States now seeks default judgment. (Docs. 14, 15.) 19 The court must consider seven factors when deciding…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Landstar Ranger, Inc. v. PARTH ENTERPRISES, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
  3. Shanghai Automation Instrument Co., Ltd. v. KueiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
  4. Curtis v. Illumination Arts, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
  5. Dolores J. Russell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API