Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Sheridan

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided September 30, 1998No. 04-97-00531-CRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICKHOFF, Justice.

Philip Sheridan appeals an order of the trial court denying relief on his pretrial application for a writ of habeas corpus. He asserts that the prior cancellation of his alcoholic beverage license constitutes punishment and that his prosecution for the conduct that resulted in the cancellation is therefore barred by the prohibitions against double jeopardy. Because we conclude that the cancellation did not constitute punishment for double jeopardy purposes, we affirm the trial court’s order.

Factual and Procedukal Background

The Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gutierrez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  2. Capps v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  3. Ex Parte Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
  4. State v. Almendarez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  5. Burg, James Allan IiCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2020

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API