Legal Opinion

Wright v. Corning

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 2011No. Civil Action 09-1567PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CONTI, District Judge.

On November 24, 2009, plaintiff Patricia Wright (‘Wright”) instituted this putative class action by filing a complaint against defendant Owens Corning (“Owens Corning” or “defendant”). (ECF No. 1.) On March 11, 2010, Wright filed an amended complaint and included Kevin West (“West,” and together with Wright, “plaintiffs”) as an additional named plaintiff. (ECF No. 22.) On June 29, 2010, plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint, which is the subject of the instant memorandum opinion. (ECF No. 49.) Waiting the court’s determination is defendant’s…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Evelyn Nye v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In Re New Century TRS Holdings, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2012
  3. Gonzalez v. CorningDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. In re GEO Specialty Chemicals Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
  5. Flores v. Kmart Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API