Legal Opinion

Flores v. Kmart Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 2012No. B229109PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TURNER, P. J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Under federal bankruptcy law, the discharge of liability for an unliquidated, contingent or unmatured claim can bar a suit to collect a debt. (11 U.S.C. §§ 101(2), 524(a), 1141(d)(1)(A).)1 In this case, Martin Flores, according to the first amended complaint, was exposed to asbestos in 1989 while performing construction work in a store operated by defendant, Kmart Corporation. On January 22, 2002, defendant and 37 affiliates filed chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions. (In re Kmart Corp. (Bankr. N.D.Ill. 2002) 286 B.R. 345, 346.) On April 22, 2003, the bankruptcy…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Indian Hills Holdings, LLC v. FryeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  2. Langer v. US Green Energy Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
  3. United Artists Theater etc. v. Cal. Regional Wat. Quality etc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. United Artists Theater etc. v. Regional Wat. Quality Control etc.11/27/19 CA1/5 Case DetailsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API