Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Niekerk

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided March 26, 1987No. 05-86-00610-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Justice.

John H. Roberts appeals by writ of error from a default judgment rendered in favor of Leo J. Niekerk. In three points of error Roberts asserts that the trial court erred in entering default judgment because: (1) the record contains no evidence that the Secretary of State forwarded process to Roberts as required by the Texas long-arm statute; (2) Niekerk’s claim was unliquidated and no evidence concerning damages was presented; and (3) the record fails to reflect a showing of good cause for the severance granted by the trial court. We agree with Roberts’ first point of error…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McKanna v. EdgarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Whitney v. L & L REALTY CORPORATIONTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Capitol Brick, Inc. v. Fleming Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Cates v. PonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Garrels v. Wales Transportation, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. WTW Americas, Inc. v. System Integration, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
  3. Kim v. FRANK MOHN A/SDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
  4. American Steel Building Company, Inc. v. Davidson & Richardson Construction Company, Fred Davidson, A/K/A Zed DavidsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  5. American Steel Building Company, Inc. v. Davidson & Richardson Construction Company, Fred Davidson, A/K/A Zed DavidsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API