Kim v. FRANK MOHN A/S
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KENT, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, insufficiency of service of process, and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. As will be set forth in detail below, the Defendant’s claims that the action should be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim are hereby DENIED, consideration of the Defendant’s personal jurisdiction motion is hereby STAYED, and the the Plaintiff is hereby granted additional time to effect proper…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sisson v. RubySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Perforaciones Maritimas Mexicanas S.A. De C v. v. Seacor Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- Topstone Communications, Inc. v. XuDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022