Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. 115-123 West 29th Street Owners Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 7, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered July 2, 1998, which, inter alia, denied third-party defendants’, AEA Protective Systems, Inc. (AFA) and Ready Alarm (Ready), motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint and all cross claims, and granted defendant and third-party plaintiff 115-123 West 29th Street Owners Corp.’s (Owners Corp.) cross motion to the extent that it sought to amend the third-party complaint to assert claims as an alleged third-party beneficiary of the contractual relationship between AFA and Ready, unanimously reversed, on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sobel v. HigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Tele-Pac, Inc. v. GraingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. 99 Realty Co. v. EikenberryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Finkelstein v. TainiterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Moores Lane Development Corp. v. Suffolk County Water AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ween v. DowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Goodwin v. Comcast Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API