Legal Opinion
Finkelstein v. Tainiter
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 16, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeíf, J.), entered April 7, 1998, which denied defendants’ motion to release plaintiffs’ escrow deposit to them and granted plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment for return of their down payment held in escrow, modified, on the law, to deny plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
On the record before us, issues of fact are present concerning *588whether, at the time of the signing of the contract in question, there was “a proposed Assessment * * * under consideration by the Board of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Citibank, N. A. v. PlapingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Primex International Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Maxton Builders, Inc. v. Lo GalboNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Sharp v. StaviskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Continental Insurance v. 115-123 West 29th Street Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Lahey v. LaheyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. HeaneyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2000
- Town of Hempstead v. Inc. Village of Rockville CentreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000