Legal Opinion

Perez v. City of San Jose

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1951No. Civ. 14766PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

This appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendants in a taxpayer’s suit raises the question of whether a municipality may use tax funds for the improvement, jointly with the state, of a state highway within the municipality’s boundaries.

Facts

The appeal is on an engrossed settled statement. The Alameda in San Jose is a part of State Highway Route No. 2. Pursuant to a prior cooperative agreement between the city and the state, the city promulgated plans and specifications for a central dividing strip 6 feet in width, electrical traffic signals, and a central highway lighting…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shea v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. City of Oakland v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. People v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. The City of Oakland v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Lewis v. Leon CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mallon v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Mallon v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API