D'AGOSTINO v. Doorley
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the CourtDoris, J.
This is an appeal from a Superior Court judgment granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint to cancel the action of the mayor and the City Council of Providence in abandoning a portion of Parley Street in said city.
Following oral argument before us on this case, the court divided equally and the judgment of the Superior Court was affirmed. D’Agostino v. Doorley, 117 R.I. 463, 367 A.2d 704 (1977). Thereafter, plaintiffs filed a motion seeking re-argument before a full court. We granted the motion (order entered February 3, 1977) and subsequently heard the parties on…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Mello v. Board of Review of NewportSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1962
- Illinois Cent. R. v. MoriarityTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gardner v. Cumberland Town CouncilSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- Certain Property Owners v. Pawtucket Bd., License Comm., 00-2953 (2002)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Frost v. Warren Zoning Board of Appeals, 02-3024 (2003)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- Gardner v. Cumberland Town CouncilSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- Gardner v. Cumberland Town CouncilSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.