Legal Opinion

ROMAN CLEANSER COMPANY v. Murphy

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1971No. Docket 7910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, P. J.

This is an unemployment compensation case. The administrative process culminated in a determination that claimant Murphy was entitled to benefits. That determination was unanimous per the Employment Security Commission, the *158hearing referee, and the commission’s appeal board. The claimant’s employer, Roman Cleanser, appealed to circuit court and it reversed, ordering Murphy to reimburse the commission for benefits unlawfully paid. Circuit court also ordered the commission to refuse further payments and to credit Roman Cleanser’s rating account for those benefits paid to Murphy and charged…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dation v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. CusickMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  3. I. M. Dach Underwear Co. v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Felcoskie v. Lakey Foundry Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Merren v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Senior Accountants, Analysts & Appraisers Ass'n v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Bingham v. American Screw Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. ROMAN CLEANSER COMPANY v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Senior Accountants, Analysts & Appraisers Ass'n v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Bingham v. American Screw Products Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API