Legal Opinion

Mead v. Holder

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 22, 2011No. Civil Action 10-950 (GK)PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Margaret Peggy Lee Mead, Charles Edward Lee, Susan Seven-Sky, Kenneth Ruffo, and Gina Rodriguez bring this action against Defendants Eric H. Holder, Jr., Kathleen Sebelius, and Timothy F. Geithner in their official capacities and Defendants United States Department of Health and Human Services and United States Department of the Treasury. Plaintiffs seek a declaration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2202 that the individual insurance mandate of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub.L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010), as…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Florida Ex Rel. Attorney General v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Seven-Sky v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  3. Tyndale House Publishers, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. Goudy-Bachman v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2012

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API