Legal Opinion

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1894No. 109PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Fifth District, in an appeal from Johnson County.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

Plaintiff and defendant are railway companies, duly incorporated under the laws of this State. In 1891 plaintiff had constructed and was operating a line of railway through Brown County, and through or near the town of Brownwood, and had acquired, owned, and was in the possession and use of the land described, operating, its railway thereon.

The defendant was engaged in constructing a line qf railway through-, the same county and town, in a direction to cross plaintiff’s road at said: town of Brownwood. On the -27th of July, 1891, defendant presented, to the county…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Houston Tap & Brazoria Railway Co. v. RandolphTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Johnston v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Burdett v. Silsbee's Adm'rTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Hatch v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Banks v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1866

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spence v. FenchlerTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Sabine & East Texas Railway Co. v. Gulp & Interstate Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. City of San Antonio v. AstoriaTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Texas Electric Service Co. v. BradfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API