Legal Opinion

Mott v. State ex rel. Klitzke

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1896No. 17,844PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Lake Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

— The relator, who is a minor, was fined in the Hammond city court, for the violation of an ordinance of said city. On appeal from this judgment to the Lake Superior Court, the relator was found not guilty, and recovered a judgment for costs against the city. On the refusal of the city to pay the judgment so recovered, this action was brought by the relator for a writ of mandate against the appellants, who are the mayor, common council, and clerk of said city, to require the allowance of his claim and the issue of a warrant for its payment. The trial resulted in the granting of a peremptory…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gum-Elastic Roofing Co. v. Mexico Publishing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Keifer v. SummersIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. State ex rel. McCalla v. Burnsville Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Tuley v. City of LogansportIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Bollman v. GemmillIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Gescheidler v. National Casualty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Steiger v. State ex rel. FieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Brock v. RudigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API